Political Science (Civics) Important Questions of Outcomes of Democracy Class 10 - FREE PDF
FAQs on CBSE Class 10 Political Science (Civics) Important Questions Chapter 5 Outcomes of Democracy
1. What are the expected outcomes of democracy in the economic sphere? (3 Marks)
Based on the CBSE Class 10 syllabus, the economic outcomes of democracy are often debated. While democracies may not always guarantee the fastest economic growth compared to dictatorships, they are expected to produce:
- More Equitable Development: Democracies aim to reduce economic inequality and poverty through inclusive policies, although success rates vary significantly.
- Transparency in Economic Governance: Democratic processes provide mechanisms to scrutinise government spending and economic decisions, reducing the chances of large-scale corruption.
- Sustainable Livelihoods: They are better equipped to consider public welfare and create policies that support a wider section of the population, rather than favouring a small elite.
2. Explain how a democratic government is considered accountable, responsive, and legitimate. (5 Marks)
A democratic government is considered accountable, responsive, and legitimate due to its core principles and mechanisms:
- Accountable: An accountable government is one that is answerable to its citizens. In a democracy, this is ensured through regular, free, and fair elections. If leaders do not perform, citizens can vote them out of power. Transparency, the right to information, and a free press also hold the government accountable for its actions.
- Responsive: A responsive government is one that listens to and acts on the needs and demands of the people. Democracy provides formal procedures for public debate and negotiation. It forms public opinion and pays attention to the grievances of the citizens.
- Legitimate: A legitimate government is one that citizens see as having the right to rule. Since a democratic government is elected by the people, it is a 'people's own government'. This popular mandate gives it legitimacy that is absent in other forms of government like dictatorships or monarchies.
3. ‘Democracy promotes the dignity and freedom of the individual.’ Justify this important statement with examples.
This statement is central to understanding the value of democracy. Democracy promotes the dignity and freedom of individuals far better than any other system of government because it:
- Guarantees Fundamental Rights: Constitutions in democratic countries grant and protect fundamental rights, such as the freedom of speech, expression, and belief. This allows individuals to live without fear of state repression.
- Upholds Equality: Democracies are based on the principle of political equality. They legally recognise the equality of all individuals, regardless of caste, religion, race, or gender, which is crucial for individual dignity. For example, it provides a basis for women to struggle for equal rights and treatment.
- Provides Mechanisms for Redressal: If rights are violated, an independent judiciary provides a platform for citizens to seek justice, thereby upholding their dignity.
4. How do democratic systems successfully accommodate social diversity?
Democracies are particularly well-suited to accommodate social diversity. No society can fully and permanently resolve conflicts among different groups, but democracies develop procedures to handle them. They achieve this by:
- Ensuring Representation: It is understood that democracy is not just the rule of the majority. The majority always needs to work with the minority so that governments function to represent the general view.
- Negotiating Differences: Democracy provides a peaceful and structured environment for different social groups to express their interests and negotiate their differences, reducing the possibility of these tensions becoming explosive or violent.
- Constitutional Protections: Democracies often have constitutional provisions to protect the rights and culture of minority communities, ensuring they do not feel marginalised.
5. What are the key differences between a democratic government and a dictatorship?
The key differences between a democracy and a dictatorship are fundamental to their structure and functioning:
- Source of Power: In a democracy, power rests with the people who elect their representatives. In a dictatorship, power is concentrated in a single individual or a small group, often seized by force.
- Rights and Freedoms: Democracies guarantee a wide range of civil liberties and fundamental rights. Dictatorships severely restrict individual freedoms to suppress dissent and maintain control.
- Accountability: Democratic leaders are accountable to the public through elections and public scrutiny. Dictators are not accountable to anyone and rule arbitrarily.
6. Why is it argued that democracies are often unable to reduce economic inequalities effectively?
While democracy aims for economic justice, it often falls short of effectively reducing economic inequalities. This is a critical challenge because:
- Influence of the Wealthy: A small number of ultra-rich individuals often enjoy disproportionate influence over political decisions. They can fund political parties and lobby for policies that benefit their interests, sometimes at the expense of the poor.
- Political Equality vs. Economic Equality: Democracy grants political equality (one person, one vote), but this does not automatically translate into economic equality. People with more resources can influence political outcomes more effectively than those with fewer resources.
- Slow Policy Implementation: The process of debate, negotiation, and consensus-building in a democracy can be slow, delaying the implementation of radical wealth redistribution policies that might be needed to reduce deep-seated inequalities.
7. Why does the principle of ‘one person, one vote’ not guarantee the absence of social and political conflict in a democracy?
The principle of ‘one person, one vote’ is a cornerstone of political equality but does not eliminate social and political conflict. The reasons for this are:
- Deep-rooted Social Divisions: Formal political equality cannot erase historical and social divisions based on caste, religion, or ethnicity. These identities continue to be a major source of conflict and competition for resources and power.
- Economic Disparities: Significant economic inequality means that while everyone has one vote, not everyone has an equal voice. The wealthy can use their resources to dominate public discourse and influence policy, leading to resentment and conflict from marginalised groups.
- Competing Interests: A democracy is a platform for diverse and often conflicting interests to compete. The electoral process itself can sharpen these conflicts as political parties mobilise support along existing social cleavages.
8. Analyse the statement: ‘The most distinctive feature of democracy is that its examination never gets over.’
This statement highlights the dynamic and self-correcting nature of democracy. Its examination is a continuous process because:
- Public Scrutiny and Debate: Democracy thrives on constant evaluation from its citizens, the media, and opposition parties. People have the right to question, criticise, and demand accountability from the government at all times, not just during elections.
- Evolving Expectations: As societies evolve, so do the expectations of citizens from their government. What was considered a success yesterday might be seen as inadequate today. This forces democracies to constantly adapt and reform.
- A Test of Itself: A democracy's success is measured by its ability to conduct these examinations openly and peacefully. When people complain or protest, it is a testament to the health of the democracy, as it shows citizens are engaged and unafraid to demand better outcomes.
9. Critically evaluate the argument that poor countries require a dictatorship, not a democracy, to achieve economic development.
This argument is highly debatable and often flawed. While some dictatorships have shown rapid economic growth, democracy provides a more sustainable and equitable path to development for several reasons:
- Human Development: Democracies are more likely to invest in education and health, creating a skilled and healthy workforce essential for long-term growth.
- Stability and Predictability: Democratic processes provide for peaceful transfers of power and conflict resolution, creating a stable environment that is attractive for investment. Dictatorships often face violent succession struggles and instability.
- Prevents Catastrophic Decisions: The need for public debate and accountability in a democracy helps prevent the kind of disastrous, unchecked decisions that dictators can sometimes make, such as the Great Famine in China. While decision-making may be slower, it is often more sound.
Therefore, associating dictatorship with prosperity is a simplistic view that ignores the long-term benefits of democratic governance.
10. What are the key challenges that hinder the effective functioning of modern democracies as discussed in 'Outcomes of Democracy'?
Despite being the preferred form of government, modern democracies face several significant challenges that hinder their effectiveness:
- Corruption and Inefficiency: Many democracies suffer from high levels of corruption, which diverts public funds and undermines trust in government. The decision-making process can also be slow and inefficient due to political gridlock.
- Role of Money in Politics: The increasing influence of money in elections and policymaking can lead to governments that are more responsive to wealthy donors and corporate interests than to ordinary citizens.
- Social and Political Polarisation: Deep divisions along social, economic, or ideological lines can make compromise difficult and lead to political instability, threatening the very fabric of democratic society.
- Ignoring the Dignity of the Individual: In practice, many democracies struggle to uphold the dignity and rights of all citizens, with marginalised groups often facing discrimination and injustice.

















