Class 8 Social Science History Chapter 2 Summary Notes PDF Download
FAQs on From Trade to Territory Class 8 Social Science History Chapter 2 CBSE Notes - 2025-26
1. How can the East India Company's journey 'from trade to territory' be quickly summarised?
The journey summarises the transformation of the East India Company from a purely commercial entity to a dominant political power. Initially arriving in India with a royal charter for trade, the Company gradually established fortified trading posts. It then began interfering in local politics, leading to pivotal conflicts like the Battle of Plassey (1757). Victory in these battles gave it administrative rights, allowing it to collect revenue and eventually annex vast territories, effectively becoming the ruler of India.
2. What is the key concept to remember about the Mughal Empire after Aurangzeb’s death?
For a quick revision, the key concept is the decentralisation and weakening of the Mughal Empire after Aurangzeb's death in 1707. As the last powerful Mughal ruler, his death led to the rise of powerful regional kingdoms as governors (subadars) and big zamindars asserted their authority. This fragmentation and internal conflict created a power vacuum, making it easier for external forces like the British East India Company to establish control.
3. What was the main purpose of the Royal Charter granted to the East India Company?
The Royal Charter, granted by Queen Elizabeth I in 1600, gave the East India Company the sole right to trade with the East. This charter essentially created a monopoly, preventing other English trading companies from competing with it in the Indian Ocean. The main purpose was to eliminate internal competition and maximise profits from trade in goods like spices, cotton, and silk, which were in high demand in Europe.
4. What were the core conflicts between the Bengal Nawabs and the East India Company?
The core conflicts, which are crucial for revision, stemmed from the Company's actions that undermined the Nawabs' authority and finances. Key points of conflict include:
- The Company's refusal to pay taxes on its private trade.
- Its expansion of fortifications without permission.
- Its officials showing disrespect to the Nawab and his authority.
- The massive loss of revenue for Bengal as a result of the Company's trade concessions.
5. How did the 'Doctrine of Lapse' serve as a key tool for British expansion?
The 'Doctrine of Lapse' was an annexation policy devised by Lord Dalhousie. The key concept is that if an Indian ruler of a dependent state died without a natural male heir, his kingdom would 'lapse' and become part of the Company's territory. This doctrine disallowed the long-standing Indian tradition of adopting a successor. It was a primary tool used to annex several kingdoms, including Satara, Jhansi, and Nagpur, thus rapidly expanding British territory without a major war.
6. Why was the Battle of Plassey considered a turning point for the East India Company?
The Battle of Plassey was a turning point because it marked the Company’s first major political victory in India, transforming it from a mere trading body into a ruler. After defeating Nawab Siraj-ud-daulah, the Company installed a puppet Nawab, Mir Jafar, and gained:
- Vast personal fortunes for its officials.
- The right to collect revenue (Diwani) in Bengal.
- Undisputed trading rights without taxation.
7. How did the concept of 'paramountcy' justify British expansion in India?
The concept of 'paramountcy', initiated in the early 19th century under Lord Hastings, asserted that the British East India Company's authority was 'paramount' or supreme. This policy justified the annexation of any Indian state to protect British interests. It implied that the Company had the right to intervene in the internal affairs of Indian states or annex them if it deemed its own power to be threatened, placing its authority above that of any Indian ruler.
8. Compare the Subsidiary Alliance with the Doctrine of Lapse as methods of annexation.
Both were key annexation methods, but they operated differently. The Subsidiary Alliance was an agreement where Indian rulers accepted British forces in their territory and paid for their maintenance, effectively losing their sovereignty and foreign policy independence. In contrast, the Doctrine of Lapse was a direct annexation policy applied when a ruler died without a natural male heir. The Alliance was a gradual erosion of power, while the Doctrine was an immediate takeover based on succession rules.
9. What were the key administrative changes the Company introduced as it became a territorial power?
As the Company gained territory, it established a new administrative structure. For a quick revision, focus on these key changes:
- Division of Territories: Administrative units were divided into Presidencies (Bengal, Madras, and Bombay), each ruled by a Governor.
- System of Justice: A new judicial system was established in 1772, creating two courts in each district: a criminal court (faujdari adalat) and a civil court (diwani adalat).
- Company Army: The Company established a professional army, recruiting Indian soldiers (sepoys) trained in European warfare with muskets and matchlocks, replacing the cavalry-dominant Mughal army.











