

How to Distinguish Theorems, Lemmas, and Corollaries in Maths
In this article, we are going to talk about theorems, lemmas, and corollary; theorems are those mathematical statements which are true and have logical proof. For example, De Moivre’s Theorem, Alternate Segment Theorem, etc. In this article, we are going to talk about how to prove different theorems and also solve some questions based on them. A corollary is a statement that follows naturally from some other statement that has either been proven or is generally accepted as true. For example, The sum of the interior angles of any triangle is always 180 degrees. A lemma is like a mini-theorem that helps you prove a bigger theorem or statement. For example, Euclid’s Division Lemma.
Table of Contents
An Overview of Theorems, Lemma, and Corollary
History of the Mathematician
Definition of Theorem
Statement of De Moivre’s Theorem
Proof of De Moivre’s Theorem
Definition of Lemma
Definition of Corollary
Solved Examples
Important Points to Remember
History of Euclid

Euclid
Image Credit: Wikimedia
Name: Euclid
Born: Mid-4th century BC
Field: Mathematics
Contribution: Euclid was the very first person to start discovering these theorems and Lemma.
Nationality: Greek
Definition of Theorem
A theorem is a mathematical statement that is true and has very logical proof. It can either be for algebra or geometry, but the result of a theorem can always be proved.
Let us take the example of De Moivre’s Theorem to explain how a theorem can be proved.
Statement of De Moivre’s Theorem
According to the De Moivre Theorem, if we raise the power of a polar complex number by n, then it is equivalent to increasing the modulus to the same power and multiplying it by the argument raised to the same power, which means:
${{(\cos x+\sin x)}^{n}}=\cos (nx)+\sin (nx)$.
Proof of De Moivre’s Theorem
Let us take a complex number $z=x+iy$. This complex number can be written in polar form as $z=r(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )$.
Here, $r=\sqrt{{{x}^{2}}+{{y}^{2}}}$ ($r$ is called the modulus/absolute value of the complex number).
When we plot the complex number on the argand plane:

Argand Plane
$\cos \theta =\dfrac{x}{r}$
$\sin \theta =\dfrac{y}{r}$
Now, let’s raise the complex number $z$ to the power $n$.
$z=r(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )$
${{z}^{n}}={{(r(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta ))}^{n}}$
${{z}^{n}}={{r}^{n}}{{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{n}}$
Solving using the principle of mathematical induction:
For $n=1$
${{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{1}}=\cos (1\theta )+\sin (1\theta )$
Assuming this to be true for $n=k$,
${{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{k}}=\cos (k\theta )+\sin (k\theta )$
Proving this to be true for $n=k+1$,
${{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{k+1}}={{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{k}}.{{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{1}}$
${{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{k+1}}=(\cos (k\theta )+i\sin (k\theta )).(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )$
${{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{k+1}}=\cos (k\theta ).\cos (\theta )+i\cos (k\theta ).\sin \theta +i\sin (k\theta )\cos (\theta )-\sin (k\theta )\sin (\theta )$
${{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{k+1}}=\cos (k\theta ).\cos (\theta )-\sin (k\theta )\sin (\theta )+i(\cos (k\theta ).\sin \theta +\sin (k\theta )\cos (\theta ))$
Using trigonometry formulae:
${{(\cos \theta +i\sin \theta )}^{k+1}}=\cos (k+1)\theta +i(\sin (k+1)\theta )$
Hence Proved.
Definition of Lemma
A lemma is nothing but a proven statement that is used to prove other statements. Lemma is like a mini-theorem that helps you prove a bigger theorem or statement.
A few examples of a lemma are as follows:
Euclid’s Division Lemma - According to Euclid's division lemma, we will always get a unique integer as the quotient and a unique integer as the remainder when we divide one integer by another non-zero integer. The theorem states that, for given two positive integers, $a$ and $b$, there exist unique integers, $q$ and $r$, such that $a=bq+r$, where $0\le r<b$. The integer $q$ is the quotient and the integer $r$ is the remainder. The quotient and the remainder are unique.
Definition of Corollary
The corollary is a statement that follows with little or no proof required from an already proven statement. For example, there is a theorem in geometry that the angles opposite to two congruent sides of a triangle are also congruent. A corollary to this statement is that an equilateral triangle is equiangular.
So for a corollary, the proof relies heavily on a given certain theorem. A corollary can be proved but it depends on some theorem heavily. There can't be any assumptions in the proof.
Solved Examples
1. Find \[X{}^\circ +Y{}^\circ \].

A Circle with Two Tangents
Ans. Here, \[\angle Y\] is the angle between the chord and the tangent and \[\angle X\] is the angle subtended at the circumference by the chord in the alternate segment.
Hence, \[\angle X=\angle Y\].
\[\angle X\] and \[30{}^\circ \] are the opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral:
\[\angle X+30{}^\circ =180{}^\circ \]
\[\angle X=150{}^\circ \]
\[\angle Y=150{}^\circ \]
2. Calculate the value of angles x and y in the given diagram.

A Circle
Ans. The tangent to the circle has the point of contact at \[C\], the angle formed between the tangent and the chord \[AC\] is \[\angle x\] and the chord \[AC\] is subtending an \[\angle y\] in the alternate segment of the circle.
\[\angle x=\angle y\] (Alternate Segment Theorem)
\[\angle ABC+\angle BAC+\angle ACB=180{}^\circ \](Angle sum property of Triangle)
\[\angle y+90+30=180\]
\[\angle y+120=180\]
\[\angle y=60{}^\circ \]
3. Find DE

Ans. According to the basic proportionality theorem:
\[\frac{AE}{DE}=\frac{BE}{CE}\]
\[\frac{4}{DE}=\frac{6}{8.5}\]
\[\frac{4*8.5}{6}=DE\]
\[DE=5.66\]
Important Points to Remember
Lemma is nothing but just a follow-up of a theorem, it helps us in proving bigger theorems.
The corollary is an idea developed from a theorem that is already proved; here, the word idea means understanding the same theorem differently to try to prove another theorem.
List of Related Articles
FAQs on Theorem, Lemma, and Corollary: Explained with Examples
1. What is the fundamental difference between a theorem, a lemma, and a corollary in mathematics?
The main difference lies in their role and hierarchy within a mathematical proof.
- A theorem is a major, significant statement that has been proven to be true based on axioms and previously established theorems.
- A lemma is a smaller, 'helper' theorem that is proven as a stepping stone to prove a larger, more significant theorem. Its primary purpose is to make the main proof clearer and less complicated.
- A corollary is a statement that follows directly from a theorem with little or no extra proof required. It is an immediate consequence or a special case of the theorem.
2. How do axioms and postulates differ from theorems?
Axioms and postulates are the foundational building blocks of a mathematical system, like in Euclidean geometry. The key difference is that axioms and postulates are statements that are accepted as true without proof. They are the starting assumptions or 'rules of the game'. In contrast, a theorem is a statement that must be proven to be true through a logical sequence of steps that rely on these axioms and other proven theorems.
3. Can you provide a simple example of a theorem and its related corollary from the CBSE syllabus?
Certainly. A well-known example from geometry is:
- Theorem: The sum of the three interior angles of any triangle is always 180°.
- Corollary: An exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of its two opposite interior angles.
4. What is a good example of a lemma used in a proof?
A classic example of a lemma is found when proving the theorem that the base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal. Before proving the main theorem, one might first prove a lemma:
Lemma: The angle bisector of the vertex angle of an isosceles triangle divides the triangle into two congruent triangles.
By proving this 'helper' statement first, the main proof for the equal base angles becomes very simple and logical.
5. Why do mathematicians need to use lemmas? Can't they just prove a theorem directly?
While it's sometimes possible, using lemmas is crucial for clarity and efficiency in complex mathematics. A lemma serves two main purposes:
- It breaks down a long, complicated proof into smaller, more digestible, and logical steps. This makes the overall argument much easier to follow and verify.
- It is often reusable. A single lemma might be used as a stepping stone in the proofs of several different theorems, making it an efficient tool.
6. How does a mathematical conjecture become a theorem?
A conjecture is a mathematical statement that is believed to be true based on evidence and observation, but has not yet been formally proven. It is essentially a hypothesis. To become a theorem, the conjecture must undergo a process of rigorous mathematical proof that is accepted as valid by the mathematical community. For example, 'Fermat's Last Theorem' was a famous conjecture for over 350 years until it was officially proven by Andrew Wiles in 1995, at which point it earned the status of a theorem.
7. Beyond maths class, what is the real-world importance of theorems?
Theorems are not just abstract concepts; they are the foundation for many real-world technologies and scientific principles. For instance:
- The Pythagorean Theorem is fundamental in construction, architecture, and navigation systems like GPS.
- Theorems from number theory, particularly those related to prime numbers, are the backbone of modern cryptography and internet security.
- Calculus theorems are essential for engineering, physics, and economics to model and predict dynamic systems.





