Question

How was the behavior of British officers to Indian?
A) Rude.
B) Arrogant.
C) Strict.
D) All above.

Answer 1

Hint: We know that the time of direct British guideline over the Indian subcontinent from \[1858\] until the freedom of India and Pakistan in \[1947\].
The raj succeeded the executives of the subcontinent by the British East India Company, after broad doubt and disappointment with organization administration brought about a boundless revolt of sepoy troops in 1857, making the British reexamine the structure of administration in India.

Complete step by step answer:
Despite the fact that exchange with India had been exceptionally esteemed by Europeans since antiquated occasions, the long course between them was dependent upon numerous possible hindrances and confusions from mediators, making exchange risky, problematic, and costly. This was particularly evident after the breakdown of the Mongol domain and the ascent of the Ottoman Empire everything except obstructed the antiquated Silk Road.
As Europeans, driven by the Portuguese, started to investigate sea route courses to sidestep mediators, the distance of the endeavor expected dealers to set up sustained posts.
The British government claimed the organization's resources and forced direct principle.
The raj was planned to expand Indian investment in administration, yet the weakness of Indians to decide their own future without the assent of the British prompted an inexorably inflexible public freedom development.
The British officials were impolite and haughty towards the Indians. They accepted that they were better than Indians and followed a strategy of disdain towards the Indians.
They named the Muslims as merciless and faithless. Some European officials abused and offended Indians.
Hence all the given options are correct.
So, the correct answer is Option D.

Note: The British endowed this assignment toward the East India Company, which at first settled itself in India by getting consent from nearby specialists to claim land, brace its possessions, and lead exchange obligation-free is commonly useful connections.
The organization's regional centrality started after it got engaged with threats, sidelining rival European organizations and in the long run ousting the nawab of Bengal and introducing a manikin in \[1757\]. The organization's command over Bengal was successfully united during the 1770s when Warren Hastings carried the nawab's managerial workplaces to Calcutta (presently Kolkata) under his oversight. About a similar time, the British Parliament started managing the East India Company through progressive India Acts, bringing Bengal under the roundabout control of the British government. Throughout the following eighty years, a progression of wars, arrangements, and additions broadened the domain of the organization over the subcontinent, enslaving the greater part of India to the assurance of British lead representatives and vendors.