Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store

Understanding Eugenics: Concepts and Applications

share icon
share icon
banner

Types of Eugenics and Their Influence on Society

Eugenics Definition: Eugenics definition states that it is a collection of ideas and practises aimed at improving the genetic quality of a human population, traditionally by eliminating or encouraging individuals and groups considered inferior or superior.


Plato proposed applying the concepts of selective breeding to individuals around 400 BC, well before the term was coined. Early proponents of eugenics saw it as a means of changing classes of people in the nineteenth century. The eugenics meaning has come to be synonymous with scientific racism and white supremacy in modern use. Modern bioethicists who endorse new eugenics describe it as a means of improving human characteristics irrespective of a group membership.


Although eugenic ideas have been practised since ancient Greece, the modern history of eugenics started in the late nineteenth century, when a widespread eugenics movement arose in the United Kingdom and quickly spread to many other countries, such as the United States, Australia, Canada, and much of Europe. During this time, eugenic ideas were promoted by people from all walks of life. As a result, several countries implemented eugenic policies to boost the genetic stock of their populations.


When the prosecution of several of the defendants at the Nuremberg trials of 1945 to 1946 tried to explain their human-rights violations by arguing there was no distinction between Nazi eugenics programmes and U.S. eugenics programmes, the eugenics movement got synonymous with Nazi Germany and the Holocaust.

What is Eugenics Movement?

Eugenics Movement

The past of the United States is marred by flaws. Slavery, the annihilation of Native American populations, and massacres committed during our various wars are only a few of our darker chapters. A fast poll would show that the majority of Americans are aware of, or have heard of, these cases. However, if you consider the average citizen about the "eugenics campaign," you would most likely get blank stares. The Genetics Generation claims that it is beyond time to draw attention to this tragic moment in our country's history.


In the early 1900s, Charles Davenport (1866-1944), an influential scientist, and Harry Laughlin, a retired instructor and principal involved in genetics, founded the eugenics movement in the United States. Davenport created the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island in 1910 with the mission of “improving the organic, physical, emotional, and temperamental values of the human family” (Norrgard 2008). The first director was Laughlin. The ERO's field workers gathered a variety of "evidence," including family pedigrees depicting the inheritance of physical, emotional, and moral characteristics.

They were especially interested in how “undesirable” characteristics like impoverishment, mental deficiency, dwarfism, promiscuity, and crime were passed down over the centuries. For 3 decades, the ERO was in service.


Eugenics was not only a subject for academics; it developed into a mainstream mass phenomenon in the 1920s and 1930s. The American Eugenics Society was established around this period, as were several other local societies and organisations around the world (PBS 1998). At fairs and exhibits, participants participated in “fitter family” and “better baby” tournaments (Remsberg 2011). Eugenics-themed movies and books became very common. The Black Stork is a storey about a black stork (1917), based on a true storey, a psychiatrist who permitted a syphilitic boy to die after persuading the child's parents that it was best to save humanity another outcast is portrayed as courageous.


Modern Eugenics

At the turn of the twenty-first century, advancements in genetic, genomic, and reproductive technology posed various concerns about the ethical status of eugenics, effectively reigniting interest in the subject. Modern genetics, according to others, is a backdoor to eugenics, as sociologist Troy Duster of UC Berkeley has proposed. 


Tania Simoncelli, then-White House Assistant Director for Forensic Sciences, claimed in a 2003 publication by Hampshire College's Population and Development Program that developments in pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) are ushering in a "new age of eugenics," and that, unlike Nazi eugenics, this eugenics is not focused on race." Children are gradually viewed as made-to-order commercial goods," according to contemporary eugenics, which is consumer-driven and market-based. 


In a 2006 newspaper report, Richard Dawkins claimed that the shadow of Nazi misuse had stifled debate on eugenics to the point where some scientists refused to believe that breeding humans for certain abilities were even feasible. He claims it is no different physically from breeding domestic animals for characteristics like speed or herding ability. Dawkins believed that enough time had passed to consider the ethical distinctions in breeding for talent and teaching athletes or requiring children to take music lessons.


Meanings and Types

Francis Galton invented the word "eugenics" and its current area of research in 1883, based on his half-cousin Charles Darwin's recent work. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Progress was written by Galton, and it included his findings and conclusions.

The origins of the idea can be traced back to some conceptions of Mendelian inheritance and August Weismann's theories.


The term "eugenics" is derived from the Greek word Eu ("good" / "well") and the suffix -gens ("born"); Galton meant it to replace the term "stirpiculture," which he had originally used but was ridiculed for its supposed sexual overtones. Eugenics, according to Galton, is "the study of all human-controlled agencies that can boost or impair the genetic standard of future generations."

The concept of eugenics has been used in the past to justify a wide range of policies, from fertility treatment for genetically suitable mothers to involuntary sterilisation and execution of those considered unfit.


The concept has been applied to the prevention of inbreeding without modifying allele levels by population geneticists; for example, J. B. S. Haldane wrote that "the motor bus, by splitting up inbred village populations, was a strong eugenic force." The controversy over what constitutes eugenics is still going on today.


Eugenics is the study of what is also viewed as a pseudoscience, according to Edwin Black, journalist and author of War Against the Poor, since what is described as a genetic enhancement of a desirable phenotype is a cultural preference rather than a matter that can be decided by rigorous scientific inquiry. The concept of "advancement" of the human gene pool, such as what is an advantageous trait and what is a flaw, has become the most controversial component of eugenics. This part of eugenics has been corrupted by scientific bias and pseudoscience in the past.

Want to read offline? download full PDF here
Download full PDF
Is this page helpful?
like-imagedislike-image

FAQs on Understanding Eugenics: Concepts and Applications

1. What is the basic definition of eugenics?

Eugenics is a discredited set of beliefs and practices aimed at improving the genetic quality of a human population. It operates on the idea of selectively encouraging the reproduction of people with 'desirable' traits (positive eugenics) and discouraging or preventing the reproduction of people with 'undesirable' traits (negative eugenics). This concept is now widely rejected for being unscientific and ethically flawed.

2. Who is considered the father of eugenics?

Sir Francis Galton, a British statistician and a cousin of Charles Darwin, is considered the father of eugenics. He coined the term in 1883 and promoted the idea that human society could be improved by applying principles of selective breeding.

3. What is the main difference between positive and negative eugenics?

The main difference lies in the approach used to alter a population's gene pool.

  • Positive Eugenics focuses on encouraging individuals deemed to have 'superior' or desirable traits (like high intelligence or physical strength) to have more children.
  • Negative Eugenics focuses on discouraging or preventing individuals deemed to have 'inferior' or undesirable traits (like hereditary diseases, disabilities, or perceived low intelligence) from reproducing, often through controversial methods like forced sterilisation or institutionalisation.

4. Why is eugenics considered scientifically flawed and unethical today?

Eugenics is rejected for several critical reasons. Scientifically, it oversimplifies genetics, as most human traits, like intelligence and behaviour, are polygenic (influenced by many genes) and heavily impacted by environmental factors. Ethically, eugenics has been used to justify severe human rights abuses, including forced sterilisation, racial discrimination, and genocide, most notably by the Nazi regime in Germany. It promotes discrimination and devalues human diversity.

5. What are some historical examples of eugenics applications?

Historically, eugenics policies were implemented in several countries. The most extreme example is Nazi Germany's programme of 'racial hygiene,' which led to the Holocaust. In the United States, over 30 states passed laws in the early 20th century that led to the forced sterilisation of more than 60,000 people, often targeting minorities, the poor, and the disabled. Similar policies also existed in countries like Sweden and Canada.

6. How does modern genetic counselling differ from the concept of eugenics?

The primary difference is in intent and autonomy. Genetic counselling provides individuals and families with information about genetic conditions to help them make informed, personal decisions about their health and reproduction. It is non-coercive and respects individual choice. In contrast, eugenics was a state-level, coercive policy aimed at controlling the reproduction of entire populations based on biased, societal standards of what is 'desirable' or 'fit'.

7. How has the Human Genome Project challenged the core assumptions of eugenics?

The Human Genome Project has fundamentally challenged eugenics by revealing the immense complexity of human genetics. It showed that the concept of 'superior' or 'inferior' genes is a vast oversimplification. Key findings that contradict eugenics include:

  • The discovery that humans share 99.9% of their DNA, making notions of racial purity scientifically baseless.
  • The understanding that most significant traits and diseases are the result of complex interactions between multiple genes and the environment, not a single 'good' or 'bad' gene.
  • It highlighted that genetic diversity is crucial for the resilience and adaptability of the human species.