Answer
Verified
418.2k+ views
Hint: According to Gauss’s law, the total electric flux associated with the closed surface is equal to \[\dfrac{1}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\] times the total charge enclosed by the surface. The total electric flux is the product of electric field E and area A of the surface. Assume that the inverse square law is not true and the electrostatic force is not inversely proportional to the square of the distance. The total electric flux associated with the closed surface does not depend on the shape of the surface.
Complete step by step answer:
We have according to Gauss’s law, the total electric flux associated with the closed surface is equal to \[\dfrac{1}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\] times the total charge enclosed by the surface. Therefore, we can express Gauss’s law as,
\[{\phi _E} = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
Here, \[{\varepsilon _0}\] is the permittivity of the free space.
We know that the total electric flux is the product of electric field E and area A of the surface. Therefore,
\[E\,A = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
We have the expression for the electric force,
\[{F_e} = qE\]
\[ \Rightarrow E = \dfrac{{{F_e}}}{q}\]
Here, \[{F_e}\] is the electrostatic force. We have the expression for the electrostatic force,
\[{F_e} = k\dfrac{{{q^2}}}{{{r^2}}}\]
Here, k is the constant.
This law is also known as inverse square law. From the above equation, we have, the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the two charges. As given in the option C, if the inverse square law is not exactly true and the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to other than square of the distance, then the electric flux will be the function of distance r that is the electric flux will depend on the shape of the surface.
But from Gauss’s law, the electric flux associated with the surface is proportional to the total charge enclosed by the surface irrespective of its shape. Therefore, the option B is correct.
We know that magnetic monopoles never exist. Therefore, the option A is incorrect. We also know that the speed of light is always constant. Therefore, the option C is also incorrect.
So, the correct answer is option B.
Note:If we have the electrostatic force which is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance r, then the electric flux through the sphere of radius r will be,
\[\phi = EA = \left( {k\dfrac{q}{{{r^3}}}} \right)\left( {\pi {r^2}} \right)\]
\[ \Rightarrow \phi = k\pi \dfrac{q}{r}\]
Thus, the electric flux will be the function of distance r that it should not be for the validation of Gauss’s law.
Complete step by step answer:
We have according to Gauss’s law, the total electric flux associated with the closed surface is equal to \[\dfrac{1}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\] times the total charge enclosed by the surface. Therefore, we can express Gauss’s law as,
\[{\phi _E} = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
Here, \[{\varepsilon _0}\] is the permittivity of the free space.
We know that the total electric flux is the product of electric field E and area A of the surface. Therefore,
\[E\,A = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
We have the expression for the electric force,
\[{F_e} = qE\]
\[ \Rightarrow E = \dfrac{{{F_e}}}{q}\]
Here, \[{F_e}\] is the electrostatic force. We have the expression for the electrostatic force,
\[{F_e} = k\dfrac{{{q^2}}}{{{r^2}}}\]
Here, k is the constant.
This law is also known as inverse square law. From the above equation, we have, the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the two charges. As given in the option C, if the inverse square law is not exactly true and the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to other than square of the distance, then the electric flux will be the function of distance r that is the electric flux will depend on the shape of the surface.
But from Gauss’s law, the electric flux associated with the surface is proportional to the total charge enclosed by the surface irrespective of its shape. Therefore, the option B is correct.
We know that magnetic monopoles never exist. Therefore, the option A is incorrect. We also know that the speed of light is always constant. Therefore, the option C is also incorrect.
So, the correct answer is option B.
Note:If we have the electrostatic force which is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance r, then the electric flux through the sphere of radius r will be,
\[\phi = EA = \left( {k\dfrac{q}{{{r^3}}}} \right)\left( {\pi {r^2}} \right)\]
\[ \Rightarrow \phi = k\pi \dfrac{q}{r}\]
Thus, the electric flux will be the function of distance r that it should not be for the validation of Gauss’s law.
Recently Updated Pages
How many sigma and pi bonds are present in HCequiv class 11 chemistry CBSE
Mark and label the given geoinformation on the outline class 11 social science CBSE
When people say No pun intended what does that mea class 8 english CBSE
Name the states which share their boundary with Indias class 9 social science CBSE
Give an account of the Northern Plains of India class 9 social science CBSE
Change the following sentences into negative and interrogative class 10 english CBSE
Trending doubts
Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE
Difference between Prokaryotic cell and Eukaryotic class 11 biology CBSE
Difference Between Plant Cell and Animal Cell
Fill the blanks with the suitable prepositions 1 The class 9 english CBSE
Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?
Give 10 examples for herbs , shrubs , climbers , creepers
10 examples of evaporation in daily life with explanations
The Equation xxx + 2 is Satisfied when x is Equal to Class 10 Maths
Why is there a time difference of about 5 hours between class 10 social science CBSE