
Gauss’s law will be invalid if
A. There is magnetic monopoles
B. The inverse square law is not exactly true
C. The velocity of light is not universal constant
D. None of these
Answer
510.9k+ views
Hint: According to Gauss’s law, the total electric flux associated with the closed surface is equal to \[\dfrac{1}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\] times the total charge enclosed by the surface. The total electric flux is the product of electric field E and area A of the surface. Assume that the inverse square law is not true and the electrostatic force is not inversely proportional to the square of the distance. The total electric flux associated with the closed surface does not depend on the shape of the surface.
Complete step by step answer:
We have according to Gauss’s law, the total electric flux associated with the closed surface is equal to \[\dfrac{1}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\] times the total charge enclosed by the surface. Therefore, we can express Gauss’s law as,
\[{\phi _E} = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
Here, \[{\varepsilon _0}\] is the permittivity of the free space.
We know that the total electric flux is the product of electric field E and area A of the surface. Therefore,
\[E\,A = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
We have the expression for the electric force,
\[{F_e} = qE\]
\[ \Rightarrow E = \dfrac{{{F_e}}}{q}\]
Here, \[{F_e}\] is the electrostatic force. We have the expression for the electrostatic force,
\[{F_e} = k\dfrac{{{q^2}}}{{{r^2}}}\]
Here, k is the constant.
This law is also known as inverse square law. From the above equation, we have, the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the two charges. As given in the option C, if the inverse square law is not exactly true and the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to other than square of the distance, then the electric flux will be the function of distance r that is the electric flux will depend on the shape of the surface.
But from Gauss’s law, the electric flux associated with the surface is proportional to the total charge enclosed by the surface irrespective of its shape. Therefore, the option B is correct.
We know that magnetic monopoles never exist. Therefore, the option A is incorrect. We also know that the speed of light is always constant. Therefore, the option C is also incorrect.
So, the correct answer is option B.
Note:If we have the electrostatic force which is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance r, then the electric flux through the sphere of radius r will be,
\[\phi = EA = \left( {k\dfrac{q}{{{r^3}}}} \right)\left( {\pi {r^2}} \right)\]
\[ \Rightarrow \phi = k\pi \dfrac{q}{r}\]
Thus, the electric flux will be the function of distance r that it should not be for the validation of Gauss’s law.
Complete step by step answer:
We have according to Gauss’s law, the total electric flux associated with the closed surface is equal to \[\dfrac{1}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\] times the total charge enclosed by the surface. Therefore, we can express Gauss’s law as,
\[{\phi _E} = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
Here, \[{\varepsilon _0}\] is the permittivity of the free space.
We know that the total electric flux is the product of electric field E and area A of the surface. Therefore,
\[E\,A = \dfrac{{{q_{enc}}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}}}\]
We have the expression for the electric force,
\[{F_e} = qE\]
\[ \Rightarrow E = \dfrac{{{F_e}}}{q}\]
Here, \[{F_e}\] is the electrostatic force. We have the expression for the electrostatic force,
\[{F_e} = k\dfrac{{{q^2}}}{{{r^2}}}\]
Here, k is the constant.
This law is also known as inverse square law. From the above equation, we have, the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the two charges. As given in the option C, if the inverse square law is not exactly true and the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to other than square of the distance, then the electric flux will be the function of distance r that is the electric flux will depend on the shape of the surface.
But from Gauss’s law, the electric flux associated with the surface is proportional to the total charge enclosed by the surface irrespective of its shape. Therefore, the option B is correct.
We know that magnetic monopoles never exist. Therefore, the option A is incorrect. We also know that the speed of light is always constant. Therefore, the option C is also incorrect.
So, the correct answer is option B.
Note:If we have the electrostatic force which is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance r, then the electric flux through the sphere of radius r will be,
\[\phi = EA = \left( {k\dfrac{q}{{{r^3}}}} \right)\left( {\pi {r^2}} \right)\]
\[ \Rightarrow \phi = k\pi \dfrac{q}{r}\]
Thus, the electric flux will be the function of distance r that it should not be for the validation of Gauss’s law.
Recently Updated Pages
Physics and Measurement Mock Test 2025 – Practice Questions & Answers

NCERT Solutions For Class 5 English Marigold - The Little Bully

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 Maths Three Dimensional Geometry Exercise 11.1

NCERT Solutions For Class 11 English Woven Words (Poem) - Ajamil And The Tigers

NCERT Solutions For Class 6 Hindi Durva - Bhaaloo

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 Physics In Hindi - Wave Optics

Trending doubts
What is the Full Form of PVC, PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP and PS ?

How many single covalent bonds can nitrogen form class 12 chemistry CBSE

What is the feedback mechanism of hormone regulation class 12 biology CBSE

What is the structure of K3CrO8 and what is the oxidation class 12 chemistry CBSE

The compound which reacts fastest with Lucas reagent class 12 chemistry CBSE

A ball is thrown vertically upwards After some time class 12 physics CBSE
